the tortured ending explained

Second of all, the news clip said that authorities have BEGUN an extensive manhunt. When Satoshi, Naomi and Ayumi finally preparing the ritual to go back to their own world, Satoshi told Naomi that he knows she took other person's paper scrap. They made it very clear the child murder got away. You can change your choices at any time by visiting Your Privacy Controls. [Editor’s note: Spoilers for The Umbrella Academy Season 2 and its ending follow below.]. I did the same thing you did after rewinding the ending and watching it again! Are you kidding me? To enable Verizon Media and our partners to process your personal data select 'I agree', or select 'Manage settings' for more information and to manage your choices. Cheng also tortured Audrey for several years as well, and as the man ultimately responsible for her death, Jack wasn't walking away without Cheng's blood on his hands. However, due to memory loss from the accident he couldn't remember anything else; all he knew was that he was a convict in a convicts uniform being tortured and told he has murdered a child, therefor he has no real choice other than to believe it, hence why he writes an apology note. Let's look at it a different way. "Lol But you are correct also if you look at the shirts the man they were torturing had blood all around the neck the man that was caught again by the police the actual child murderer had blood in different places on his shirt if you look you can notice it in several scenes . Could you imagine how much that would reduce crimes against children if the predators knew this is what awaited them? Who in the fuck is the anonymous left wing liberal asshole above that said above "it was kind of sad when I thought they were torturing the right man"? The tax evader was probably the neighbor who complained about hearing cries coming from the basement (which was questionable to me because who hears noises from another person's basement). He then ultimately commits suicide on the grounds that he deserves to die. The cops caught a guy with no head wounds, no chest wounds, nothing...just dirt on his shirt. If you’re reading this, then you’ve reached The Umbrella Academy Season 2 ending. Ratched's Mind-Scrambling Ending, Explained. We and our partners will store and/or access information on your device through the use of cookies and similar technologies, to display personalised ads and content, for ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. That happened way before they even decided to kidnap the guy! I guess this was the thought of the producers when they create the movie... however, it could have been a better scrren wrriting... lots of dialogs without any reasons... she felt the need to blame someone ? I'd love to see that! He actually scribbled the note when he came from the basement. He truly was a blank slate, unable to defend with anything but what he had, "I don't remember anything". I mean do think that even they want to rehabilitate piece of shit child predators? They didn’t capture the guy the couple had tortured! I normally don't have time to respond to things like this, but this time I feel compelled. Your explanation clears it up for me. They tortured the wrong guy who actually had amnesia. As for all the comments, and I admit, I did not read them all: many of them were inaccurate. It also show the murderer being caught by police. Lesson learned, and able to move on with their grieving, without having actually killed him. I look for other features as well such is browS or possibly ears. You could hear him scribbling something and see it in his hand when he is walking from window. The big twist - The husband and wife, although seeking revenge, became the very type of people whom they despised! The ending would have been much more satisfying if they had shown the couple finding out that they had tortured the wrong man...which they should have figured out before the torturing ever began, seeing as you would never forget the face of your child's killer...banged up or not. The car alarm tease seemed to have been cleared up when rifleman visited. pity he didnt fuck the kids ass that would have made the film better, Just go and browse through some serviceed online websites and acquisition out the deals of your best with just few simple clicks.That partnership included the expansion of Adobe products, primarily the Creative Suite and Flash, on Research In Motion devices.You will get amazing discounts and thus saving your money.Visit my blog ... blackberry playbook review, he wrote the note when he came upstairs, when she sat on the toilet, you could clearly hear him scribbling down words on the paper and you even saw it in his hands when he turned around. Freak. Some people just want to sound intelligent by coming up with their own little theories about the plot, not realizing that the film is actually black and white; despite everything else, all you have to do is look at their damn faces to realize they have the wrong person. (obviously trying to convince him and/or herself). He knew that he was a coward. Also, the real kidnapper (the tax evader) and the convicted man looked nothing alike. Now, in the ending of the anime you see Satoshi, Ayumi, and Naomi getting ready to leave and performing the Sachiko ritual to get back to their world. The Tortured is a descent movie but it has far too many plot holes, the main one being the addition of the 2nd criminal. That is absolutely devastating. I was like WTF and then figured it out. There are plenty of so-called experts online so beware. Out in the Dark (Hebrew: עלטה ‎) is a 2012 Israeli romantic drama film which premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2012 and in Israel in the Haifa International Film Festival in October 2012. First time I watched it I didnt really pay much attention.. They convinced him he did it because they were so sure it was him! I feel like they left a lot of holes open for there to be a possible shitty sequel. They bury him so no one would be the wiser. it is no doubt not him. So he killed himself thinking he was that terrible child killer. Thank you...what is wrong with these people...I can't stand it jesus gawd! We don't know who's right or wrong but we all got lost at the end of the movie. They just wanted to confuse us and make us wonder if they did or not. How many of you actually watched the movie? Tortured had a great storyline. The real killer is a psychopath and a real psychopath dosen't feel anything about being sorry, as this kind of people have mental ill which dosen't makes them feel what a normal person would feel. Most women don’t know this... but even if a man is attracted to you or even says he loves you......chances are he still feels something is missing.Because there is a secret, emotional need hidden within his heart that he craves more than anything.And in most cases, is not being met.The problem is, if it’s not being met, his attention will inevitably wander until he finds a woman who can give it to him.Maybe one in a thousand women knows how to do this instinctively, and they usually rise to unbelievable levels of influence and fame.But most women, or men for that matter, don’t even know it exists.On the other hand, when you have this 1 simple secret...You won’t believe the shocking effect you have on the men in your life.Here’s a video I discovered that shows you exactly what I’m talking about:Here’s how: ==> He’ll give his heart to the first woman who does THIS... ]Best,Ana. So yeah they actually tortured the tax evader who lost is memory he only knew there sons name bc he heard it from them first. Well of course the viewer can get these points, feel the chills, be sorry for the wrong guy et cetera, but since there is no characters allowed to realize this, the movie ends without an ending - everyone is happy and everyone is a bad person. It even showed him looking through the basement window at the tax evader, no they had the wrong man....the one that hung himself had a bandage round his right leg..which was the child killer...his note referred to what he had watched through a window..not even he cud handle it...theres yor twist. There in the text, where the universe is speaking to the player, the player is the universe and therefore God. Every single other movie with a twist at the end let's the character react to that - look at SAW or The Sixth sense. Right away on their corporate website, and even the domain name. Puzzled now wondering if they tortured the man who killed their son, or the other prisoner that was in the van with him. The only thing they screwed up on was when she knocked him out from in the bathroom he didn't have the note in his hand but had already written it. :D, She said "it's the same man" referring to weather his memory wads there or lost. Why would they be in the woods? The tax evasionist thought he really did kill those people's kid because he really had amnesia from the wreck. Thanks a lot for sharing!Check out my web page ... cellulite treatment, Mobile gadgets are becoming our main source of information.Equipped with the latest 3rd generation Intel Core series processors, a wide selection of ports, and up to 15 hours of real-world battery life, the T430 is one of the best business notebooks of 2012._To present to three other people to join in the support.My blog: samsung galaxy s3. You can also read a recap of … Isn't that a hoot. And they should go to jail... like alot. The ending of Minecraft explained. You were never in this movies production. And he started believing that he did kill their son bc he was wearing prison clothes and all that. Revenge: The ending could also mean that Vane wanted to seek revenge from him. For the rest of you who are totally confused about the twist...they tortured the wrong guy! They tortured the wrong guy, but he probably deserved too. That's why he left the note (an innocent person would not have done that), could only stare at her (before walking out the front door), and didn't try to get away. Actually it was backwards ,the Man that jumped of the chair was the Man that killed their son and the Man that the police got was the Man that they were torturing. Yet they go right along talking to him and he clearly hears them and reacts to their words. I am not being rude, but some of your run on sentences are difficult to read. You're incredibly wrong, and the person who wrote te post is correct. with all the different comments was it him or was it not him? Nevertheless of the meaning, I didn't like the movie and don't think it's a good one. I even noticed how it wasen't the right guy. must be around 50. The tax evader was caught and reprisoned. When the murderer manages to avoid life in prison through a plea bargain, the Landry’s decide that a minimum of 10 years isn’t enough for this disgusting asshole. Lord have mercy on us all :(. They tortured the right person. Even if you argue that the killer may have told the tax evader the child's name that part was never in the movie. We saw killer dude's FACE look in basement window. At one point he was outside the house. Hee hee.The news story about killer dude being off in the woods was just a flashback to a point before he was caught. How could anyone SEE the ending and not recognize that?? Up to that point, I had assumed that the search would end when the runaway killer was apprehended, allowing the couple to get out of dodge...going off into the sunset, taking with them some significant thoughts to ponder about the ethics of revenge, involving its possible inability to heal pain, as well as potential harm to the soul of the avenger. I agree that the film touches upon morality of torture and ethics, but I feel it was a bit of a fuck you to the audience, Like the guy kills kids only gets 25 years and avoids being tortured. You're wrong. Instead, the girls are each holding one of his arms, with the rest of him nowhere to be seen. They had the right guy. The Cobra Kai season 3 ending, arguably, kicks off the most important chain of events in Karate Kid history. BUT BUT BUT, HERE is the number 1 reason that PROVES they had the WRONG guy, go to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1017464/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast and look at the billing for the movie. if not to emphasize the fact that there were two prisoners in the prison van. There is a very brief flashback sequence at the end where the wife, while arguing with the husband, says something like "It's the same man!" That was WAY before they kidnapped the guy. She said she just needed someone to blame. Hence why the wrong guy had blood and bruises covering his face for the whole film, so the audience wouldn't realize it's the wrong guy until the end. I just watched the movie and rewound it 10 times, paused scenes, and compared faces. The couple tortured the tax evader, not the child killer. First of all, they did not have the right man. What sucked about the ending was that YES they tortured the wrong guy, but due to his amnesia he confesses to that crime. The Prom Ending Explained. Other than to fake us out during the woods hunt? Well, he WOULD need a liver transplant, lickety split. He wrote the note when he escaped and is in the house, with his back turned to us. He knew that he was an abomination. Just as it was set up, the season finale of Ratched is a complex set to events, both imaginary and real, taking place simultaneously. It doesn't matter how many of your own details you try to throw in. Not trying to be grammar police it was just funny. The tax evader was the kidnapper and the killer. They could have gotten an actor that looked like the murderer in the first place; even with the wounds and blood on his face, the tortured guy did not resemble the killer. Did you NOT see the killer in court? We all rewind, then reach for goggle. It is the directorial debut of Michael Mayer (מיכאל מאיר).. I think I'm more disturbed by the ambiguity of the ending. I just see this movie and this is my own opinion. Unfortunately it sounds like they added too much cheese to the mix, as most films do anymore. Amy is kidnapped by Josh after she starts a video diary in her search for Megan. How did he remove bruises on his eyes?? At least this is my interpretation. The cops were told of one escape convict in a cabin. Their actions caused them to not only torture another human being, but in the process, they became tortured. We all saw his face. As they are faced with empty nests and changes of pace, many will decide to sell in order to compete in the business is an easy one. The part where he can't remember is actually more important than people realize. )/ ha ha . The Spy on Netflix ending explained. Right before she hit him with the pipe, you could see the note in his hand. He was the one seen killing his self in the end. There is no argument for the other way around. They did in fact show the tax evasionist writing the note very briefly. People. How could they have missed another guy being loaded in the van? Where did he have time to clean it?? Watching their reactions would've been pretty cool. The Paramedic movie's ending explained. Overall good plot, The ending(even though still imperfectly executed) saved this movie from being kinda trashy. I am a grandmother of a 5 year old boy and I would have wanted to do just as they did, I am ashamed to say it disappointed me that they had the wrong guy. The original person who wrote this did pretty good. Actually, the ending is an exact reflection of the "justice" system. we dont give a fuck who was tortured at least the tax evader got his deserts. Justice I think not. Probably a halfassed attempt to raise the plot above a mere torture for revenge scenario. Worked slightly, now I have something to talk to my daughter about who is a real Bill Mosely fan. So yesterday i watched this film staring Jesse Metcalfe and Erika Christensen which was released in 2010, The Tortured. And the RIGHT guy well... he walks away - yeah to a prison but that's much better than the torturechamber. Happy ending. Its half a smart idea, but the fact they was in the court room with the man that killed their son you would never forget that face. She is talking about blaming the husband...why she can't just blame the guy that did it I don't know! Find out more about how we use your information in our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. It features a major plot twist which serves as the surprise ending, however, if you don't see this twist coming a mile away then your I.Q. In this case, they made a horrible mistake and not only tortured the wrong man, but convinced a non violent man that he HAD tortured their child and although he was to serve eighteen months in prison for fraud, he is tortured believing he had tortured a child. I mean the couple was there at the prison doing their recon. By the way they captured the child killer, and they most likely got away. It's the little changes that make the greatest changes. i’m so sorry but i fap’d when the chick was shitting on toilet. silja danielson .. you thick bitch he wrote the note just before the mother hit him with the pipe..if someone raped your ass would you be as stupid? This was obviously shot before they captured the real Koslowski. If they did NOT torture the wrong guy, then why even have a "Patrick Galligan" to begin with? Craig and Elise had all the ingredients for an ideal life: a great marriage, a wonderful five-year-old son, a charming home and a bright future. Galligan's character comes BEFORE Kozlowski's. The bandage on his leg is different than the killer's. He wanted to die but as he said but he was a coward and could not stand to be tortured anymore so he killed his self before they could. It's the same exact guy, for fucks sake. if you really wanted to give advice don't throw a smart ass comment like "but some of your run on sentences are difficult to read". Assholes get off easy everyday, while the little guy gets pigeonholed for bs. As the cops capture the tax evader they assume that's the one convict reported and unrealistically end the man hunt. It is NOT a horror movie; aside from the contemplation of pain, there is nothing scary about this lousy B-movie. Then the fraud guys note..only problem is that psychopaths don't apologise !! The BIG message is "do NOT take the law into your own hands." Enjoyed reading all this as I ran to google right after I finished watching this. If you're a Netflix viewer who's not cowed by what Parasite director Bong Joon-ho called "the one-inch-tall barrier" of subtitles, then you're likely clued in to La Casa de Papel, or Money Heist. you see I notice teeth, both good and bad. Basically, the tax evader had flashbacks, hence how he knew their child's name. This movie was a sloppily done and the confusion was inevitable. And if you go to the court room scene, the man the police arrest again is CLEARLY the same guy. My phone auto corrected. ... the alleged specter of Notch's brother or remnant of a tortured man. PS: They never would have stopped the search for the 2nd inmate. And the murderer is clearly seen being arrested. Did you not read that AMAZING summary above on March 22 at 12:37am? Did you NOT see who they captured at the end, alive? They are hilarious, especially the comment about the ear drums being exploded but still able to have a conversation with him. Watch the movie again ya thick cheeky blokes! I just watched this movie some minutes ago and even after several times rewinding i still didint get what happ. Listen for him writing and tearing the note. "Justice is about tempering revenge"... Fuck you, in real life people like this monster portrayed in the movie deserve everything the tortured guy got and more. The the other guy was pure evil and, memory loss or no memory loss, wouldn't have given a shit and wouldn't have felt any remorse for killing their child. You think it really cost that much per prisoner or do you think there are some politicians and prison officials lining their pockets with excess funds? They actually show the tax evader writing the note at a table at the top of the stairs (his back is turned but you can hear writing and the tearing of the paper) but the real flaw is when he walks out the front door the note is no longer in his hand. Otherwise you did pretty good. And the movie was BAD. Interview with the Vampire was a box office success when it premiered in 1994. The couple are the "tortured" ones! I know this for a fact , bc I worked on this film as crew member . Justice is about tempering revenge from one or a few people so that everyone bears some of the weight on their behalf. There were explosive reveals, huge actions scenes, and more than a few loose ends tied up. And its not rocket science, why else introduce the tax evasion character towards the end? Syria’s war explained from the beginning. No bloodied chest. Hence him talking his own life. OK seriously? He knew that he would continue to kill boys once he was released from prison (that's why his sentence was made known to us). The ONLY thing that I had to do...which only took a few seconds...was rewind a bit, to clearly view the face of the captured man in the woods, making sure there hadn't been a third dude in the van. But its so clear now wollymammoths mammoths I disagree.. This leave us with a clear answer for all : They torture the wrong guy.The producers of the movie cleary want the audience to belive something else and when the movie ends, they leave the audience with a question : Tortured 2 will appear ? It was already widely known that the convicts had escaped. The film tells the story of a couple, Elise Landry (Erika Christensen) and her husband, Craig Landry (Jesse Metcalfe), whose lives are shattered when a serial killer named John Kozlowski (Bill Moseley), kidnaps, tortures, and kills their only son, Benjamin. Lol. While it wasn't the first found footage movie, 1999's The Blair Witch Project was the one that made the genre popular. Whomever said they got it backwards clearly did not pay attention. that movie makes you feel stupid lol. OMG he wrote the note when he went upstairs and had his back towards us.... GOOD EYE, I was sitting here racking my brain trying to figure out when he actually wrote the stupid note! Before entering the bedroom. Then, he gave her his paper scrap because he had Yuka's (his sister) one. Warning: This article contains major spoilers for all three seasons of the HBO Max series Search Party.Proceed with caution. That to me means she had a strong idea it wasn't the right man they were torturing. 'Red Sparrow' ending explained The premise of the story revolves around the life of a Russian intelligence officer Dominika (played by Jennifer Lawrence), who is sent to contact a CIA officer Nate Nash (played by Joel Edgerton) in the hope of discovering the identity of a mole who is passing secret intelligence information. Smh. Megan Is Missing ending explained. Remember, torture works, and mom wanted the name. I havent even seen the movie and it sounds viscerally disturbing. But the reality is the episode wasn't supposed to be the finale, it was to be a cliffhanger and the show just got cancelled before they could resolve it. Is this, then, supposed to say that there is a potential "monster within all of us"--the audience? Since Kozslowski was a serial murderer, I'm pretty sure it would have been a terrible idea not to warn people that he had escaped.
the tortured ending explained 2021